csgators Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I have been trying to figure out how to word this correctly but I'll just cut to the chase. The income tax is the modern equivalent of slavery. In order to support myself I must support whomever the government has decided needs it more than I do. Plus the bureaucracy associated with the transfer. Does anyone else feel this way? I do not intend to minimize the hardship that actual slaves went through in the past and in fact go through in this very day and age but morally I see very little difference. At least the old slave masters were honest about it, with income tax many claim it is charity as if charity could be forced upon someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ub3rman123 Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Because all those schools and roads will pay for themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ita Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I don't, I pay a certain percentage of my income to the county council/government and receive things such as subsidized practically free health care and free education. It's worth it, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csgators Posted May 28, 2011 Author Share Posted May 28, 2011 Because all those schools and roads will pay for themselves. That assumes the income tax is the only way to pay for things. Not to mention the seemingly purposeful blurring of local, state and federal taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csgators Posted May 28, 2011 Author Share Posted May 28, 2011 I don't, I pay a certain percentage of my income to the county council/government and receive things such as subsidized practically free health care and free education. It's worth it, IMO. I get virtually nothing except a military off building schools after blowing them up in other countries. Schools are for paid via property taxes here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ita Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 I don't, I pay a certain percentage of my income to the county council/government and receive things such as subsidized practically free health care and free education. It's worth it, IMO. I get virtually nothing except a military off building schools after blowing them up in other countries. Schools are for paid via property taxes here. Sounds to me like you should gather a bunch of people, come up with signatures for a petition and show it to your local politician/congressman/whatnot and try to get some changes done. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marharth Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 I don't think property taxes should pay for schools, the poorer areas have worse schools due to it. Its hard to say what the best tax system should be. Income tax does force you to give away money, but what is the better option? I would like to know what you think would be the best system, explain the system entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csgators Posted May 28, 2011 Author Share Posted May 28, 2011 (edited) I don't think property taxes should pay for schools, the poorer areas have worse schools due to it. Its hard to say what the best tax system should be. Income tax does force you to give away money, but what is the better option? I would like to know what you think would be the best system, explain the system entirely. That's easy.http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_main The FairTax Act (HR 25, S 13) is nonpartisan legislation. It abolishes all federal personal and corporate income taxes, gift, estate, capital gains, alternative minimum, Social Security, Medicare, and self-employment taxes and replaces them with one simple, visible, federal retail sales tax administered primarily by existing state sales tax authorities. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg9fesMAvwA&feature=player_embedded EDIT: Keep in mind that the 23% figure would make it revenue neutral, I think it should be 10% and the feds should restrict spending to that level of revenue. Edited May 28, 2011 by csgators Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisnpuppy Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 Sounds like the flat tax to me. Who would this fair tax hurt more....if it is the same for everyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csgators Posted May 28, 2011 Author Share Posted May 28, 2011 Sounds like the flat tax to me. Who would this fair tax hurt more....if it is the same for everyone? You only pay when you spend money, obviously that means the rich will pay way more in taxes. Necessities are not taxed. You are only taxed when you but PlayStations and new cars, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now