trold Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Oh, he wants to be Console Jesus. Good for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wunderbot Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Him acting like the PC-console thing is some sort of social discrimination and turning it into such a big deal actually makes me cringe more than the super unfunny and overused "PC masterrace" joke itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyDungas Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 as a PC nut that defends console users especially on mods, I'm just glad I don't care for his mods and I hope other authors won't be as angsty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
covadonga Posted May 28, 2016 Share Posted May 28, 2016 (edited) Coffee for everyone. I understand that people do ports to console of their mods as I did with the BAR mod but being a kind of crusade pro console is pointless in my modest opinion Edited May 28, 2016 by covadonga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zanity Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 Current Nexus policy ENCOURAGES toxic behavior and feelings (having just discovered I was blocked by a certain mod author from even read-only access - a function that is frankly INEXCUSABLE and is designed to give fragile egos a sense of entitlement that always leads to conflict). In the light of Beth.net competition, Nexus should rethink the psychology of this service, and try to find a path to encouraging ROBUST attitudes in the minds of modders and users of said mods. Telling modders that fragile egos are a 'good' thing is a recipe for disaster, frankly. In the meantime expect more modders to take the "I'm picking up my ball and taking it home" attitude. Some are simply looking for an excuse to go Beth.net exclusive- at least until they test whether Beth.net can provide significant financial returns. PS I've seen moderators here jump all over a mod author for simply posting FAIR USE images in the image section- and such heavy handed tactics are bound to have a negative effect. Nexus may have a rule against many forms of fair-use imagery, but blocking an entire mod from view (rather than just blocking the image section) is another example of the types of overkill that cause bad blood. I would like to see Nexus respond to the competition with a light-touch, play nice approach that ENCOURAGES open-source type thinking (ie., an active encouragement for modders to allow their mods to be used by other modders). The current 'modder is god' policy plainly strokes some egos in an unfortunate way- and the results are all too predictable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deleted3507349User Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 (edited) Current Nexus policy ENCOURAGES toxic behavior and feelings (having just discovered I was blocked by a certain mod author from even read-only access - a function that is frankly INEXCUSABLE and is designed to give fragile egos a sense of entitlement that always leads to conflict). In the light of Beth.net competition, Nexus should rethink the psychology of this service, and try to find a path to encouraging ROBUST attitudes in the minds of modders and users of said mods. Telling modders that fragile egos are a 'good' thing is a recipe for disaster, frankly. In the meantime expect more modders to take the "I'm picking up my ball and taking it home" attitude. Some are simply looking for an excuse to go Beth.net exclusive- at least until they test whether Beth.net can provide significant financial returns. PS I've seen moderators here jump all over a mod author for simply posting FAIR USE images in the image section- and such heavy handed tactics are bound to have a negative effect. Nexus may have a rule against many forms of fair-use imagery, but blocking an entire mod from view (rather than just blocking the image section) is another example of the types of overkill that cause bad blood. I would like to see Nexus respond to the competition with a light-touch, play nice approach that ENCOURAGES open-source type thinking (ie., an active encouragement for modders to allow their mods to be used by other modders). The current 'modder is god' policy plainly strokes some egos in an unfortunate way- and the results are all too predictable. :huh: Edited May 29, 2016 by digitaltrucker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noahdvs Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 Current Nexus policy ENCOURAGES toxic behavior and feelings (having just discovered I was blocked by a certain mod author from even read-only access - a function that is frankly INEXCUSABLE and is designed to give fragile egos a sense of entitlement that always leads to conflict). In the light of Beth.net competition, Nexus should rethink the psychology of this service, and try to find a path to encouraging ROBUST attitudes in the minds of modders and users of said mods. Telling modders that fragile egos are a 'good' thing is a recipe for disaster, frankly. In the meantime expect more modders to take the "I'm picking up my ball and taking it home" attitude. Some are simply looking for an excuse to go Beth.net exclusive- at least until they test whether Beth.net can provide significant financial returns. PS I've seen moderators here jump all over a mod author for simply posting FAIR USE images in the image section- and such heavy handed tactics are bound to have a negative effect. Nexus may have a rule against many forms of fair-use imagery, but blocking an entire mod from view (rather than just blocking the image section) is another example of the types of overkill that cause bad blood. I would like to see Nexus respond to the competition with a light-touch, play nice approach that ENCOURAGES open-source type thinking (ie., an active encouragement for modders to allow their mods to be used by other modders). The current 'modder is god' policy plainly strokes some egos in an unfortunate way- and the results are all too predictable.Speaking of toxic behavior and a sense of entitlement... Gee, I wonder why you were blocked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maload Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 who is he ,anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
threedog1421 Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 (edited) Making his mods console-exclusive is a really stupid move IMO. This is only going to fuel the console-hate and is going to open the gate to more 'exclusive' mods, be it for PC or console. Aside, if people really want his mods, I don't think they'll have a lot of problems converting them to PC. I'm also laughing my ass off at all these requests in the thread. The only few mods he has done are mesh reshapes/editing and new helmets, yet people are requesting him to add new (female) armor, unique weapons, bigger boobs, graphical improvements, gameplay changes, .... lol.Yeah, I saw that as well. Jesus of console modding is getting buried by dumb after dumb request. And honestly, his mods really aren't that great so feck him. I couldn't stop laughing either. Edited May 29, 2016 by threedog1421 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickysCoffey Posted May 29, 2016 Share Posted May 29, 2016 You've got to be kidding me. "PC Release Coming End of Next Year." What the hell is this guy doing? He was EA for a day and then went straight to Activision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts