AishaLove Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 It's not wrong, both ways are just as useful and the way the institute has it means less wasted paper when it unrolls too much. Ever think that the smarty pants people at the institute haven't done studies to figured out the optimal everything? including paper roll orientation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorKaizeld Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 It's not wrong, both ways are just as useful and the way the institute has it means less wasted paper when it unrolls too much. Ever think that the smarty pants people at the institute haven't done studies to figured out the optimal everything? including paper roll orientation?They are still arguing over it! A mere study is meaningless on this subject! Everyone is right and everyone is wrong. The only people who have truely solved this debate in the wasteland are the ghouls... They just dont wipe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimensionlord1 Posted March 7, 2017 Author Share Posted March 7, 2017 It's not wrong, both ways are just as useful and the way the institute has it means less wasted paper when it unrolls too much. Ever think that the smarty pants people at the institute haven't done studies to figured out the optimal everything? including paper roll orientation? If it unrolls just re-roll it. Not too complicated unless someone for whatever reason spins the whole roll off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilfre16 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 It's not wrong, both ways are just as useful and the way the institute has it means less wasted paper when it unrolls too much. Ever think that the smarty pants people at the institute haven't done studies to figured out the optimal everything? including paper roll orientation? If it unrolls just re-roll it. Not too complicated unless someone for whatever reason spins the whole roll off. Again, I'm looking at you Dave, you son of a b*tch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perraine Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 It's not wrong, both ways are just as useful and the way the institute has it means less wasted paper when it unrolls too much. Ever think that the smarty pants people at the institute haven't done studies to figured out the optimal everything? including paper roll orientation?They are still arguing over it! A mere study is meaningless on this subject! Everyone is right and everyone is wrong. The only people who have truely solved this debate in the wasteland are the ghouls... They just dont wipe. EEEEWWWWW !!!! What has been imaged in the mind cannot be un-imaged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorKaizeld Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 It's not wrong, both ways are just as useful and the way the institute has it means less wasted paper when it unrolls too much. Ever think that the smarty pants people at the institute haven't done studies to figured out the optimal everything? including paper roll orientation?They are still arguing over it! A mere study is meaningless on this subject! Everyone is right and everyone is wrong. The only people who have truely solved this debate in the wasteland are the ghouls... They just dont wipe. EEEEWWWWW !!!! What has been imaged in the mind cannot be un-imaged. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athanasa Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Â As a cat owner, those toilet rolls are positioned correctly to minimise chances of spontaneous cat based bogroll disassembly.There aren't any cats in the Institute that I know of though.Replace cats with toddlers. Arguably more destructive, and you can't get away with 'accidentally' locking them outside overnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts