Net Neutrality - The End is the Beginning

[TheMastersSon]

So, basically, if someone else had done it, charges would have been filed, but, since it was Hilary, they did not recommend charges.

That's neither what they said nor meant. The accurate paraphrase for what they said is, there was violation but no prior intent to do so, or criminal consequences from doing so. Thus the charges are non-prosecutable, unless we're willing to prosecute our entire federal government, the idea of which I'm not against. :) If you see the words Hillary or Clinton anywhere in your quote, imo you should seek help immediately from a qualified mental health professional. And sorry for not logging into this site first before reading this forum today. Welcome back to my ignore bin.

Edited December 26, 2017 by TheMastersSon

[twowolves80]

The problem with the Clintons is, they were in bed with the Bushes as far back as the 80s, so the same crime syndicate is still running the show. These are all the same people and they're all a part of what amounts to organized crime. Trump is just the latest, and I'm beginning to think he's a patsy. They needed a lightning rod for the Americans to fixate on as they tack on small, silent addendums to these bills like the one that repealed privacy on searches. The problem is Blackwater. The problem is KBR. The problem is Halliburton.

How can the Clintons even live with themselves knowing that they were aiding and abetting the very people destroying our country from within? I'm beginning to think Barry Goldwater was right more and more. The enemies are already in the gates.

[TheMastersSon]

Trump is indeed the ultimate patsy imo. Even Tillerson called him a moron. When the time comes he will duly start the conflict that ends our country and most of the civilized world forever. Meanwhile Trump will be well on his way to Antarctica on his 102-suite boat with his chosen few, as virtually everything north of them quickly and slowly dies of radiation poisoning. And then Rod Serling finally steps out of the wings and explains to us the dangers of incremental fascism. I've been waiting for this explanation for almost 47 years now, since our federal government first began pretending that it's possible even in theory for free market capitalism to compete with totalitarian Communism. Now would you kindly refer to your U.S.-PRC trade charts and tell us what you see.

 

After almost a year in office and his almost daily redefinition of incompetence and national embarrassment, I'm convinced The Donald is either entirely or almost entirely a media phenomenon not any kind of business genius. He's certainly not a competent politician and is therefore unfit for his current office, an opinion shared by a majority of Americans. As I've said elsewhere Trump is a Republican the same way Hitler and Stalin were socialists. He's just proved it with his intentional trumping of our FCC and their near-immediate subsequent treason against their sworn oaths of office.

Edited December 26, 2017 by TheMastersSon

[Deleted54170User]

I never imagined that breaking open this Net-Neutrality Legality stuff would prove it has good in it. Only to find that there was nothing more in it but rotten swill, wine turned to vinegar, men filled with knowledge of corruption, and a crisis in every order from farming, ranching, sheep herding, etc.. It looks like not one, NOT ONE spot was missed on this entire planet.

 

When awakened with a thought for getting what I need this morning I immediately had so much stress I had know choice except to go to the lavatory. After I was refreshed I sat back an pondered the posts list here at the forum.

 

I slowly, like a sloth, getting my head cleared of the fog and stress remembered I always do this. I open with a plan ( after I review everything ) to find peace.

 

That usually starts with a question to begin with, "What skill do I have I may use?"

 

The next question, "Out of all the different parts that I understand how they work, what may I make use of that will provide a better way getting what is needed?"

 

Hmm?

 

I must get the approval of everyone in my own home, in my own family, and my friends so that I may do something that will affect them first too 1st!

 

I see all of you are aware of many social and governing conditions.

 

I need to understand how, do all of you brilliant authors (many of you who have posted here on this topic) plan to help to get the world to begin to heal?

 

I sense I can safely say, you know you can do something, I have not the ability to see yet in my shop full of tools. I ask of you...will you show me some items from within your shops I may not yet be acquainted with I might add to my shop and be better enable me to share in the healing process?

[TheMastersSon]

Regardling Hillary Clinton's emails, somewhere between most and nearly all of this campaign to attack who knows what exactly is being run by a single senator (Ron Johnson), who at least from my reading has now leaned so far to the right that he has actually tipped over.

[Deleted54170User]

I meant your tools!

 

Not the tools provided by any of our government's source.

 

Oh! Now I remember one time like this one, TheMastersSon came by after I posted and began beating his/her* drums again without a response to my note resembles.

 

When I was little a neighbor asked if I would mow their lawn after I got done mowing the yard where I lived. I thought I could earn some money doing it. I didn't stop mowing Mom's yard. I finished it.

 

I was about to go across the street. I was towing the push/pull lawnmower behind me. Just as I neared the end of our families sidewalk my Mom shouted out the window, "That's my lawnmower!" She didn't need to elaborate any further.

 

I left the tool behind. When I knocked on the neighbors door that woman across the street would not answer her door.

 

Which leads me to a similar conclusion.

[twowolves80]

So what tools would YOU suggest since public apathy/complacency is at an all-time high...? Or are you going to try to tell us that sticking to methods that don't work when an organized crime syndicate is in power and fighting to disguise that fact while raping the county's wealth is the way to go?

Wake up, man. The plutarchs have taken over. Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about letting the military industrial complex take over, and guess what? We now have Kellogg, Brown and Root and Haliburton and the Clinton Foundation ruling the roost. That's the Bushes, the Cheneys, and the Clintons all running the show. Why do you think Chelsea wants in now?

 

And I don't think Hillary wanted in because she was worried about her emails; that was secondary to cleaning up after her bungling husband's early career that left a lot of loose ends to tie up.

 

They (the Clintons, the Bushes, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, John Kerry, and everyone else associated with the Iran-Contra affair) are all sweating bullets now that Mueller is on their trail because of Russia, and if he investigates Russia far back enough, he's going to dig up the connection to the Clintons, which is going to lead to the Iran-Contra affair again because Iran was one of the people funding terrorist attacks against Russia.

 

Believe me, somewhere, there's a file marked TS-SCI (that's Top Secret-Sensitive Compartmentalized Information) that has all the real facts of what happened in the Iran-Contra Affair that will never see the light of day.

Red, blue, republican, democrat--powerful corporate influences are once again at play and splitting the country apart. They're both on the same team and filthy as hell.

Edited December 26, 2017 by twowolves80

[HeyYou]

So what tools would YOU suggest since public apathy/complacency is at an all-time high...? Or are you going to try to tell us that sticking to methods that don't work when an organized crime syndicate is in power and fighting to disguise that fact while raping the county's wealth is the way to go?

 

Wake up, man. The plutarchs have taken over. Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about letting the military industrial complex take over, and guess what? We now have Kellogg, Brown and Root and Haliburton and the Clinton Foundation ruling the roost. That's the Bushes, the Cheneys, and the Clintons all running the show. Why do you think Chelsea wants in now?

 

And I don't think Hillary wanted in because she was worried about her emails; that was secondary to cleaning up after her bungling husband's early career that left a lot of loose ends to tie up.

 

They (the Clintons, the Bushes, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, John Kerry, and everyone else associated with the Iran-Contra affair) are all sweating bullets now that Mueller is on their trail because of Russia, and if he investigates Russia far back enough, he's going to dig up the connection to the Clintons, which is going to lead to the Iran-Contra affair again because Iran was one of the people funding terrorist attacks against Russia.

 

Believe me, somewhere, there's a file marked TS-SCI (that's Top Secret-Sensitive Compartmentalized Information) that has all the real facts of what happened in the Iran-Contra Affair that will never see the light of day.

 

Red, blue, republican, democrat--powerful corporate influences are once again at play and splitting the country apart. They're both on the same team and filthy as hell.

That's been the case for quite some time now. It's all just a dog and pony show for the masses, while the rich get richer, and accumulate more power. And when the dems get back in power, (which should happen within the next couple elections.....) their war against the 2nd amendment, disarming the law-abiding populace, will complete their campaign. Then they really can do whatever they want, and there won't be anyone to stop them.

Edited December 26, 2017 by HeyYou

[TheMastersSon]

I often wonder how our courts would react to an organized plan and march to forcibly replace everyone in DC, hold new elections and replace the entire lot of them. Not that these replacements would be something other than human and thus immune from eventual corporate cronyism and corruption, the same way our current set of employees are, but at least it would shake up the near-total PAC control of our current reps, and we might actually start solving our national problems instead of continuing to simply create them. I'd like to see the legal debate over whether such a move would even qualify as a revolution, because the effort would be to forcibly reestablish constitutional law in our country after its collapse, not overthrow it or our form of government. Just our current set of corrupted employees. Edited December 26, 2017 by TheMastersSon

[HeyYou]

I often wonder how our courts would react to an organized plan and march to forcibly replace everyone in DC, hold new elections and replace the entire lot of them. Not that these replacements would be something other than human and thus subject to eventual corporate cronyism and corruption, the same way our current set of employees are, but at least it would shake up the near-total PAC control of these current reps, and we might actually start solving our national problems instead of continuing to simply create them. I'd like to see the legal debate over whether such a move would even qualify as a revolution, because the effort would be to forcibly reestablish constitutional law in our country after its collapse, not overthrow it or our form of government. Just our current set of corrupted employees.

I think leaving out the word "forcibly" might give ya some more traction.... Trouble is, the folks in power want to stay in power, so, they would NOT go quietly. If they had even a whiff of what was going on before it was ready to roll, they would have measures in place to make sure it wouldn't succeed. And give that you would NEED publicity to get the word out, they would know well in advance what was going on....

 

Wonder if there is a method for calling for a "no confidence" vote for the entire government????