Chadonraz

Tagging "assisted" by AI would cause more problems than it might solve. More than likely you would soon be complaining about how the AI is tagging mods incorrectly -- and be joined by other users.

10 years, plus one day short of 4 months. I joined on December 27th, 2013 -- a day after I bought Skyrim on Steam (I have the email receipt). I had been playing the game on my Xbox 360, but that December bought my first gaming PC. It was time for modded goodness after countless hours of vanilla.

I can't easily find an update available one, but the downloaded one definitely is miles better now. Thanks.

I agree regarding the 'Downloaded' indicator. If colour or other highlighting isn't possible, the icon should at least be larger. I didn't even spot it until I looked at the "classic" version screenshots to check where it's located on those. (I don't mind the 'updated' or 'uploaded' indicators; I find them clear and sufficient.)

I know how to see the number. That is not what I, or the OP for that matter, asked.

If there is a way, I can't find it. In classic or beta view. I also wonder when (and from whom) I got mine.

I agree, too. Forums are not some silly competition. Besides, that yellow is way too bright, especially when the background is so dark. (This despite yellow being my favourite colour.)

Frankly, I believe having an option to display one's gender on one's profile would cause more problems than it would be worth, because, unfortunately, there are far too many people on the internet who would turn it into an issue, misuse it (mainly in the case of a custom field), harass others based on what the field says, and so on. If there were the binary options male/female, some people would take issue with it because it's not inclusive enough. If there were more than those two options, some people would take issue with it because it's too inclusive. If there were three options, male/female/prefer not to say, those choosing the last option would get targeted by malicious people. A custom field would cause mixed issues. It's just not worth it, in my opinion. It's easy enough to simply refer to people as 'they' when you don't know what the person's gender or preferred pronoun is.

Looks a lot better now. Less bright colour is better when the base colour is black or grey. Thanks!

Must have been "The Rear Window". An Alfred Hitchcock thriller/mystery from 1954, and a classic, for those unfamiliar with the title. And, yes, it was a VHS.

32. My 33rd birthday is coming later this year.

That would leave three options: 1) Staff members and/or volunteers do the tagging: Unrealistically high workload. Doesn't remove the human error factor. A terrible idea. 2) Some kind of an algorithm or AI does the tagging: Mistakes, mistakes, and mistakes would be made, resulting in very unreliable tagging. A terrible idea. 3) No tagging: A terrible idea. Can't say I've ever had a problem with tags, anyway.

I noticed that, too. It actually let me block myself. "Successfully blocked user". What exactly is that going to do? I don't want to test the Report button, because I'm not sure if it would give me a box where to write a reason. I don't want to risk accidentally sending a self-report.

I noticed an issue with my video on the new profile. Its link goes to /videos/1 instead of the correct video. On the old profile the link correctly goes to /videos/297.

Thanks, and for finding a way to do it too.

I'm not sure what the exact topic here is, but I have a couple of comments about stuff I see already posted. Regarding something like a musician whose character, behaviour, and/or actions are questionable, but their music is good: 1) If you consider the music (product) separate from the musician (producer), you can enjoy the music while despising the musician. 2) If you don't make the distinction between product and producer: you either dislike the product purely because of the producer, even if you would enjoy it if its producer was different, or don't avoid the product but feel like you should. As for caring about what rich/famous/influential people think or say: 1) If it's someone in a position where they can affect your life (e.g. a high-ranking political figure in your country, or the owner of a social media platform you use), then, depending on the opinion, it can be only natural to care, as it might affect you. 2) If it's some "influencer" or generic celebrity (e.g. an actor or a musician), especially one who plays no role in your life, then there's no reason to care. Many people do, but I really don't see any reason to. There are exceptions, of course; for example, if Celebrity X clearly expresses advocating for something truly heinous, that is worth caring about. Not because of the person, but because of the advocation. (Anyone who tries to force their views down others' throats absolutely should be ignored, no matter who they are. The more obnoxious they are the more thorough ignoring they deserve.)

SimPark, from 1996. That game was soooo much fun. My brother and I spent who knows how many hours playing it. Our favourite thing to do, one that is not supposed to be done, was trapping park visitors in areas of varying sizes. They'd slide down a slide and never be able to leave.

"Sycamore Row" by John Grisham. The first book by him I've read, and I will be reading more of his books in the future because this one is really good.

In my opinion, it depends. If someone makes a mod from scratch (i.e. without using assets from someone else's free mod), then I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed to paywall it. But if content from a free mod is used in a paywalled mod, then I see a problem; the paid mod's author is gaining monetary benefit from work done by someone else for free, which doesn't seem fair. Unless the free mod's author explicitly allows it. I'm never going to use paid mods, but their existence doesn't bother me; I have the freedom to choose what I do or don't use.

Agreed. There could be an option to click on the number of reactions, which would bring up a list of people who gave that reaction. That's how it works on the forum I frequent the most. It can be interesting to see who reacted to what, and not just to one's own posts, either. It can even be useful for moderators, e.g. to see who reacted to a problematic posts. Speaking from personal experience here. Granted, they may already have the ability to see that here, for all I know.

This would be a great feature to have. I have checked the box for notifications about replies to my comments, but having a post history (like exists here on the forums) would be much better.

I like the new look. That's all I can really say, as I have no mods/content/anything else so there isn't much to compare.

Nothing wrong with lemons. Wouldn't eat a whole lemon, but a slice or two isn't bad. Sour, sure, but not too sour.

My favourite part in the Deep Dive video was hacking the drinks machine. Totally something I would do as well. :p

I'm not sure what you mean by "a manual", but The Unification Patch is a mod you can use to achieve the desired result.