AlienSlof Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 Most modders mod games for themselves first and foremost. Sharing them is secondary, if we feel that others might enjoy our creations too. Enforcement of anything like this would just stop some from sharing altogether. Ultimately, it's the player who loses out while the modders continue to enjoy the fruits of their own labours privately. I do like reading changelogs when they're available, just as I like to read patch notes for games I'm playing and this is why I include them - but doing such should NEVER be enforced. We're hobbyists. This is what we do for fun. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showler Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 I mean, if nothing else, unless the person has kept a record of the changes they made then suddenly being confronted with a compulsory "change-log" field when uploading is not going to produce a good result. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickysaurus Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 I think this problem effectively goes away when we improve the UX for adding a changelog. Right now is very clunky and you have to go out of your way to do it. I'm also aware the changelog is page-level, not file level which isn't super handy for complex mod pages. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LenaWolfBravil Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 14 hours ago, Pickysaurus said: I think this problem effectively goes away when we improve the UX for adding a changelog. Right now is very clunky and you have to go out of your way to do it. I'm also aware the changelog is page-level, not file level which isn't super handy for complex mod pages. Making it possible to have separate change logs per file would be fantastic! Especially since Nexus Mods encourages mod authors to combine single-file mod pages into a larger multi-file one. I have a number of mods with many files in them, and it does get quite messy noting the changes to the different files in a single change log. Messy both for the mod author and for the users since they can't get a filtered history of changes to the individual file they are interested in. Similarly, it would be nice to have a better integration between the main mod description tab and the articles or something similar. I have resorted to using articles to describe the individual files on the mod page because otherwise the main description becomes way too long and impossible to maintain for me, as well as hard to follow for the users. I am hoping the new design will overhaul all that focusing on multi-file mod pages. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kregano Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 15 hours ago, Pickysaurus said: I think this problem effectively goes away when we improve the UX for adding a changelog. Right now is very clunky and you have to go out of your way to do it. I'm also aware the changelog is page-level, not file level which isn't super handy for complex mod pages. Yeah, the user flow for changlelog definitely could be improved. I think putting it on the same page as file uploads would do a lot to encourage people to actively maintain their changelogs, simply by making it easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickysaurus Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 There's a whole bunch of things that we want to do to the mod page flows. Sometime in the future we're moving the current mod page to the new website and will look at improving it sometime after. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyBlade Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. Even if changelogs were compulsory, a majority of users probably wouldn't even read them. Getting users to read a mod description or FAQ is a herculean task in of itself let alone a changelog. It's a good practice to have updated changelogs but you can't penalize an author if he doesn't have one. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickysaurus Posted November 5 Share Posted November 5 10 hours ago, JohnnyBlade said: You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. Even if changelogs were compulsory, a majority of users probably wouldn't even read them. Getting users to read a mod description or FAQ is a herculean task in of itself let alone a changelog. It's a good practice to have updated changelogs but you can't penalize an author if he doesn't have one. That's probably a fair generalisation, but there are exceptions. I always read changelogs. I actually find it annoying when an app on my phone or a game on Steam updates without publishing a changelog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyan49 Posted November 5 Share Posted November 5 To me, changelogs are never optional, just like we're not allowed to upload a mod without a description. Then mod authors can add it to mod descriptions, sticky posts, mod file descriptions, or all of them as needed. Usually changelogs are in one of those places, but it's inconvenient when they're not in a place they should be. I know that changelogs in changelogs aren't effective for casual users, but leaving changelogs blank affects regular users. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now