Jump to content

Left-Wing, Right-wing, or Central?


Daedthr

Recommended Posts

Wurs is trolling now.

Actually, I agree with him. :) It may not be politically correct, but, it is indeed accurate. :D

 

? I was talking to Aurielius. I will start adding @ when I post to avoid any further confusion; such as @ MotoSxorpio. :sleep: I have no idea what some people post here since they add nothing tangilble to the conversation. They're in the way like spoilt children so they've been blocked. I do not talk to ignorant unpleasant people in RL and I see no reason to do so here. :armscrossed: They can vent their neutrotic attention-seeking frustrations on someone else. I am not interested.

But, you quoted me.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Wurs is trolling now.

Actually, I agree with him. :smile: It may not be politically correct, but, it is indeed accurate. :D

 

? I was talking to Aurielius. I will start adding @ when I post to avoid any further confusion; such as @ MotoSxorpio. :sleep: I have no idea what some people post here since they add nothing tangilble to the conversation. They're in the way like spoilt children so they've been blocked. I do not talk to ignorant unpleasant people in RL and I see no reason to do so here. :armscrossed: They can vent their neutrotic attention-seeking frustrations on someone else. I am not interested.

But, you quoted me.......

 

@Hey You

We all quote you...one time or another... :teehee:

 

@WursWaldo

I would have responded just was not aware that I was the intended recipient. I do not block posters but some days I ignore certain authors and the thread itself for similar reasons.

On topic...there are very convenient leaks that Biden and Warren had a Saturday meeting....(chuckles)..I guess the path to coronation is not so sinecure for Hilary. I don't think that Biden is the brightest candle in their repertoire but I will concede that he is an honest honorable man...which is a refreshing change of pace for DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@HeyYou

Now I'm confused. I thought Moto was talking about my post about Trump. I didn't know he thought (and now you think) I was trolling you when I quoted you and gave the definition for pornocracy. I didn't make that word up and it accurately describes what you were talking about in your post. That's not trolling in anyone's book.

 

If referencing Saeculum obscurum is politically incorrect, then some people here need to thicken their skins, or at least understand what they are pointing fingers at as being offensive. Or maybe Dark0ne needs to add Wikipedia to the Nexus blacklist.

 

@Aurielius

I haven't had chance to catch up on the morning news. I'm still on my first cup of coffee. I'll do some reading before I post my opinion.

Edited by WursWaldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Wurs is trolling now.

Actually, I agree with him. :smile: It may not be politically correct, but, it is indeed accurate. :D

 

? I was talking to Aurielius. I will start adding @ when I post to avoid any further confusion; such as @ MotoSxorpio. :sleep: I have no idea what some people post here since they add nothing tangilble to the conversation. They're in the way like spoilt children so they've been blocked. I do not talk to ignorant unpleasant people in RL and I see no reason to do so here. :armscrossed: They can vent their neutrotic attention-seeking frustrations on someone else. I am not interested.

But, you quoted me.......

 

@Hey You

We all quote you...one time or another... :teehee:

 

@WursWaldo

I would have responded just was not aware that I was the intended recipient. I do not block posters but some days I ignore certain authors and the thread itself for similar reasons.

On topic...there are very convenient leaks that Biden and Warren had a Saturday meeting....(chuckles)..I guess the path to coronation is not so sinecure for Hilary. I don't think that Biden is the brightest candle in their repertoire but I will concede that he is an honest honorable man...which is a refreshing change of pace for DC.

 

My concern with Biden is, he's OLD. IF he does run, gets elected, he's probably only good for a single term. Another small concern is that he has had tragedy after tragedy, and is likely emotionally exhausted. I think you are right, though, HeyYou, he is an honorable statesman with plenty of experience in Washington. If Warren gets on that ticket, we might have a real race for the DNC, she's been influential with appointments to several committees on financing and middle class concerns such as housing, aging, education...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Wurs is trolling now.

Actually, I agree with him. :smile: It may not be politically correct, but, it is indeed accurate. :D

 

? I was talking to Aurielius. I will start adding @ when I post to avoid any further confusion; such as @ MotoSxorpio. :sleep: I have no idea what some people post here since they add nothing tangilble to the conversation. They're in the way like spoilt children so they've been blocked. I do not talk to ignorant unpleasant people in RL and I see no reason to do so here. :armscrossed: They can vent their neutrotic attention-seeking frustrations on someone else. I am not interested.

But, you quoted me.......

 

@Hey You

We all quote you...one time or another... :teehee:

 

@WursWaldo

I would have responded just was not aware that I was the intended recipient. I do not block posters but some days I ignore certain authors and the thread itself for similar reasons.

On topic...there are very convenient leaks that Biden and Warren had a Saturday meeting....(chuckles)..I guess the path to coronation is not so sinecure for Hilary. I don't think that Biden is the brightest candle in their repertoire but I will concede that he is an honest honorable man...which is a refreshing change of pace for DC.

 

My concern with Biden is, he's OLD. IF he does run, gets elected, he's probably only good for a single term. Another small concern is that he has had tragedy after tragedy, and is likely emotionally exhausted. I think you are right, though, HeyYou, he is an honorable statesman with plenty of experience in Washington. If Warren gets on that ticket, we might have a real race for the DNC, she's been influential with appointments to several committees on financing and middle class concerns such as housing, aging, education...

 

Reagan was 69 when he ran and was 77 when he left office. Biden is a survivor if nothing else.

I don't think Warren will run this time as I believe there was some agreement with the dems that they would throw in with Hillary. If Joe is gonna run he needs to do it now. Honestly I don't think he stands a chance. He has not stood out in any way as VP and I'm not sure half the folks even know who he is.

 

Personally I think I may write in my own name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden is the current Vice President, anyone who actually votes in a democratic primary would have to be really dumb to not know who he is. I think it would be good for Biden to run because it would give more of an incentive for Clinton's campaign to actually try harder and step up their game as well as give Sanders a better chance at the actual nomination. It's not good to have too many people in a political party, like the GOP currently has, to be running against each other. But it's also not good when there is too few people running against each other in a political party. Biden jumping in the game would make the Democratic Presidential race a lot more interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden won't get (many) votes from the under 35 demographic...but might get all those above. His tragedies could play into voting through sympathy. :(

 

And what I mean about age...he's 72, has seen family too young to go go for what only can be described as acts of god. He tends to seem not completely in the moment sometimes. I'm talking mental and emotional stability and health, here. ;) And where will his campaign money come from?

 

Is Biden going to beat out Hillary and Bernie? I dunno, while I have expressed concerns for Biden, I would probably consider his bid over all of the others. He does seem the most sensible and I doubt he would be in office just to be there, like Hilly or The Donster. :armscrossed:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden is the current Vice President, anyone who actually votes in a democratic primary would have to be really dumb to not know who he is. I think it would be good for Biden to run because it would give more of an incentive for Clinton's campaign to actually try harder and step up their game as well as give Sanders a better chance at the actual nomination. It's not good to have too many people in a political party, like the GOP currently has, to be running against each other. But it's also not good when there is too few people running against each other in a political party. Biden jumping in the game would make the Democratic Presidential race a lot more interesting.

 

 

I live in a State where people still say Obama is Muslim. A State where they voted a convicted white-color criminal into the Gubernatorial office twice and still elect his daughter for Congress. A State where folks vote straight ticket democrat and do not know the name of the vice president. Do not ever estimate the stupidity of the general public.

 

And it may indeed light a fire under Clinton or make it more interesting but I still think Joe is not a good candidate. A good man, a survivor for sure. Someone who has seen more misery than anyone ever should. But that does not make a good president.

 

Personally instead of having Hillary toss pot shots at Joe, I'd rather her start answering some of those questions she's been ducking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@HeyYou

Now I'm confused. I thought Moto was talking about my post about Trump. I didn't know he thought (and now you think) I was trolling you when I quoted you and gave the definition for pornocracy. I didn't make that word up and it accurately describes what you were talking about in your post. That's not trolling in anyone's book.

 

If referencing Saeculum obscurum is politically incorrect, then some people here need to thicken their skins, or at least understand what they are pointing fingers at as being offensive. Or maybe Dark0ne needs to add Wikipedia to the Nexus blacklist.

 

@Aurielius

I haven't had chance to catch up on the morning news. I'm still on my first cup of coffee. I'll do some reading before I post my opinion.

Oh no, I didn't think you were 'trolling me'. From what I have seen, that isn't something you do. Besides, I agree with you. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...