Klipperken Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 The setting is worse in FO4 than it was in FO3 or NV. They failed to capture the bleakness of the post apoc, or the vast wastelandAnyone ever played pen-n-paper Warhammer?Is known with Realms of Chaos? Now, at any rate, one can find info on this online, but such a chaos landscape would fit quite well, given the radiation and the likes. OOOH, Killer Tomatoes.... (Wasteland 2, darned awesome game, with funny references to whatever one can think of). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boombro Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 The setting is worse in FO4 than it was in FO3.At least it makes more sense in FO4 over FO4. There is many farms, guards, clean water and trade going on. The DC looks like a leigit city since it has docs, a school, traders and everything. And it looks more built, not the scarp towns in FO3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamBacon Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Fallout 4 portrays the post apocalypse better than Fallout 1-3, Tactics, and New Vegas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chucksteel Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 (edited) It is most likely going to be the default page you sort the load order on. Yes, but I don't see anything in the .swf for doing that, I'm really wondering if Beth even thought about Load order. there are no "button Presses" to adjust the LO. I'm also assuming it will ether redirect you to Bethesda.net or have some sort of in-Game browser. Again I'm just curious because this file was not included before patch 1.4 Edited March 7, 2016 by chucksteel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoliteRaider Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Fallout 4 portrays the post apocalypse better than Fallout 1-3, Tactics, and New Vegas. Personally I think 1 and 2 did a better job within the graphical and gaming limitations of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minngarm Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 The setting is worse in FO4 than it was in FO3.At least it makes more sense in FO4 over FO4. There is many farms, guards, clean water and trade going on. The DC looks like a leigit city since it has docs, a school, traders and everything. And it looks more built, not the scarp towns in FO3. rewrite that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boombro Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 rewrite thatSorry, @ minngarm I thought I was clear? Is it the editing or the wording? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x2ash Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 bethesda have sold out and are doing everything they can to grab every last dollar they can..good on em i guess, the share holders are happy..so yes they would be holding back on the geck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loxly Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 rewrite thatSorry, @ minngarm I thought I was clear? Is it the editing or the wording? Your first line says : "FO4 over FO4" You also abbreviate DC: Do you mean Diamond City [The major city in FO4] or District of Columbia [the pre-war name for the setting in FO3] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamBacon Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 Fallout 4 portrays the post apocalypse better than Fallout 1-3, Tactics, and New Vegas. Personally I think 1 and 2 did a better job within the graphical and gaming limitations of the time. Handicaps aside though, I think Fallout 4 simply did a better job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts