rmm200 Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 It would help if people reporting malware would indicated where they are located. Some parts of the world are riskier for malware than others.That and Vortex really needs to post a checksum. Then we could verify the package Vortex sent is actually the package you got.My trust in the world wide internet has gone down a lot in recent years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickysaurus Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 As far as I can tell, this is a false positive from Windows Defender. Very similar to when Microsoft's AV decides random mod files that have been up for ages are malicious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostDragonist Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 The code in question is Detours, not Detour. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/detours/ This is Microsoft's code which only Microsoft's Windows Defender is picking up as a trojan. That's a little funny. I'm guessing someone released some sort of trojan that uses Detours for nefarious purposes so now any legitimate usage of Detours is being picked up as that trojan. Detours is being used in the node-native-errors module: https://github.com/Nexus-Mods/node-native-errors. Best I can tell, the code for Detours used by Vortex is unchanged from the code provided by Microsoft. So... all in all, probably nothing to worry about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlantirDarke Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 I did the Malware Bytes, Hitman Pro and Windows Safety Scanner round of scans and they all came back negative. After another windows scan, it supposedly found the threat and removed it. To be safe I scanned the Vortex folder and the mods folder where I last installed mods and nothing came up. Ran vortex and so far no odd computer behavior. So I'm inclined to agree (hopeful) that it's a false positive. I'll defer to the the judgement of the almighty coders on this though. :) AD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovlad84 Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 I've reported this to MS Defender team with all the relevant info, including link to this thread.I'm 99.99% sure that it's a false positive on Defender's part though, so hopefully they'll just update its definitions and it will stop freaking out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadToRegister Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 Kaspersky user here, no such report.What seems to be in common with everybody who is getting the alarm is that they're using "Windows Defender"Microsoft: Here's why Windows Defender AV isn't ranked higher in new antivirus tests Windows Defender still has problems with incorrectly classifying legitimate apps as malware, according to the January-February test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amoeba00 Posted August 4, 2019 Author Share Posted August 4, 2019 It would certainly help if the file hashes could be posted so folks could also use that as a tool to determine if the original source has been compromised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovlad84 Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 Looks like it's been fixed with their latest definitions (1.299.1250.0). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AugustaCalidia Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 It would certainly help if the file hashes could be posted so folks could also use that as a tool to determine if the original source has been compromised.Use Vortex feedback to send that suggestion to the developers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amoeba00 Posted August 4, 2019 Author Share Posted August 4, 2019 Looks like it's been fixed with their latest definitions (1.299.1250.0).Just updated the definitions and still got the same alert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.