Important Security Notice

[DagothBob]

I deleted the sentence telling you guys off but...

 

In all seriousness please return the 6 digit level of password like say my BANK and CC accounts have.

[DancerBV]

In response to post #75991243.

DagothBob wrote:

I deleted the sentence telling you guys off but...

 

In all seriousness please return the 6 digit level of password like say my BANK and CC accounts have.

Don't you think it'd be better to keep your password on a site that's had its security breached multiple times in the past different than your most important passwords such as your bank's?

[MikeInWare]

Very dissatisfied with how long it took to notify us. Should be hours not weeks!. Do better. Edited December 27, 2019 by MikeInWare

[keeshah]

In response to post #75977823.

Mushashi7 wrote: Thank you for being both strategic, honest and informative about this!

Mush

I would like to second that. I know for sure, that a lot of sites get hacked and never report anything about it. This way I know at least, that my password is down the toilet and that I need to change it.
Cheers,
Kee.

[Arthmoor]

In response to post #75991243. #75998803 is also a reply to the same post.

DagothBob wrote:

I deleted the sentence telling you guys off but...

 

In all seriousness please return the 6 digit level of password like say my BANK and CC accounts have.

SnowFox35 wrote: Don't you think it'd be better to keep your password on a site that's had its security breached multiple times in the past different than your most important passwords such as your bank's?

I'd suggest you inform your bank that 6 digit passwords are easily cracked instead and get them to improve things. After all, the data in that bank account is far more important to you than the account you have here.

[Guest deleted34304850]

yeah, in a previous post i actually mentioned the encrypt/decrypt becomes a performance issue unless you can take advantage of a hardware based encryption facility which is probably not available on a fisher-price server system.

 

am i going to explain it? yeah, i'll do that, under a paid for subscription to my class model. i offer reasonable rates.

[Arthmoor]

In response to post #76012348.

1ae0bfb8 wrote:

yeah, in a previous post i actually mentioned the encrypt/decrypt becomes a performance issue unless you can take advantage of a hardware based encryption facility which is probably not available on a fisher-price server system.

 

am i going to explain it? yeah, i'll do that, under a paid for subscription to my class model. i offer reasonable rates.

You know, if you can't explain it or are wrong about this you could just say so :P

[Guest deleted34304850]

Yes, but as it's neither, your point is moot. :P

[DancerBV]

In response to post #76016883.

1ae0bfb8 wrote:

Yes, but as it's neither, your point is moot. :P

Why do you always try to start arguments? It doesn't benefit anyone, nor serve any purpose.

There's no reason why regular discussion couldn't occur here, even in controversial news threads like these.

Not everyone is automatically your enemy.

[Arthmoor]

In response to post #76016883. #76019668 is also a reply to the same post.

1ae0bfb8 wrote:

Yes, but as it's neither, your point is moot. :P

SnowFox35 wrote: Why do you always try to start arguments? It doesn't benefit anyone, nor serve any purpose.

There's no reason why regular discussion couldn't occur here, even in controversial news threads like these.

Not everyone is automatically your enemy.

Except I think it is. Either you're wrong about this, or you just don't care to explain what you mean. So many discussions could be nice and friendly if that happened more often.

Maybe you're addressing an entirely different thing here and your explanation could clear that up instead of leaving it to the masses to interpret your meaning.