HeyYou

Read the stickied thread "removing unwanted effects" at the top of this forum.

Erm, on my menu, it says specifically "Journal"...... Even an option to mark a quest as 'abandoned', or, "I am not going to do this" to get it out of the active quest log would have been nice.....

Back up your data folder before uninstalling. With the older games (not tied to steam) the uninstaller would only remove files placed there during the installation. I don't think steam is quite so discriminate. I suspect it will remove EVERYTHING.

What vid card ya got?

Your argument is full of fallacious assumptions about the necessity of a state. You are assuming without the state that particular and arbitrary things won't get accomplished. This was the same argument they made in defense of slavery by stating "without slavery, who will pick the cotton?" except now many statists bellow "without the government, who will build the roads?". As Murray Rothbard once said, the statist confuses the necessity of SOCIETY with the necessity of the STATE. I'd recommend watching this: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=0H2rSJayL_c Is it? Show me ONE significantly sized group of people that without help of a government, constructed roads, bridges, a police force, fire department, or even a friggin hospital. Saying the state is REQUIRED to do all of these things is not only juvenile but simply laughable. Aside from the moral reasons in opposition to the state, the economic arguments are quite basic. The state is incapable of calculating the opportunity costs of production and has no way of calculating, economically, where the most efficient use of resources should be directed. Both of these problems result in an extremely high level of inefficiency in providing even the most basic of services. Look up the Icelandic Commonwealth (Medieval Iceland). This "significantly sized" group as you put had private defense agencies instead of a monopoly police force as well as what is now referred to as private law or private dispute resolution. A very good read from David Friedman: http://www.daviddfri...nd/Iceland.html If you want to resort to insults, you can be added to my ignore list with a few quick clicks. Also, running off a line of feces is not an argument. None of what you discuss there matters one whit to the state, or the people. The people want roads to drive on. Individually, they are going to be unable to build the infrastructure required for such a project. convincing enough folks that it is a 'good idea' is one thing, getting the to do, let alone PAY FOR IT, is an entirely separate issue. Also, your argument falls flat in the face of american history. The US government started the interstate system to ENCOURAGE commerce, and make it easier to transport goods around the country. They KNEW it would be a boon to the economy, both in the jobs created by the projects themselves, and the commerce they enabled. No problem, I can give you five off the top of my head: Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia. I'll even describe one for you: Croatia is built like that, 4.5 million people who live on a private property of foreign companies. Politicians do nothing but bark at each other and they have no real power since everything inside the border is owned by someone else, even the border. All of our road repairs and road/bridge constructions are funded and controlled by German private companies and are built without any consent from the government (our highways don't even have a building license but they are still built and used), same goes for the fire department. Hospitals are funded and controlled by Pliva, who is in turn controlled by US and German pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Bayer. Police force is controlled my the Ministry of Internal Affairs which does nothing if NATO doesn't request it, it's funded by US and is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. http://forums.nexusmods.com/public/style_emoticons/dark/rolleyes.gif Hotels - foreign, clinics - foreign, hospitals - foreign, police - foreign, sea - foreign, land - foreign, electrical company - foreign, phone companies - foreign, water company - foreign, roads - foreign, oil company - foreign, military - foreign, government - exists but politicians do nothing whatsoever but sit on their arse and get payed for doing nothing. Nothing in Croatia is owned by it's government and they don't help anyone but themselves. Also, half the government is in prison for theft, bribery, smuggling, murder, extortion, racketeering, war profiteering, threatening, etc. http://forums.nexusmods.com/public/style_emoticons/dark/laugh.gif The same situation is in the other four countries I mentioned, they just have a different name. So you see, you don't need a government for the state to function. http://forums.nexusmods.com/public/style_emoticons/dark/biggrin.gif No, you need foreign governments, and private companies operating at the behest of same.... How is that in any way considered "Anarchy"? That's fine, I'd rather not listen to an irrational statist who has yet to present any evidence of their position in a thoughtful and logical fashion. Line of feces? My undergraduate field of study is in economics, a field in which you clearly do not understand. If rational arguments presented with references offend you, that's fine, I've noticed in my line of work statists are very wary of economics in relation to the state. You've demonstrated you are unwilling to even investigate the material I've presented. Would you to provide any references for your incorrect statements? You've got a tough academic career ahead of you it sounds like kid. Another good article to investigate is a great book or entry on Robert Nozick's "Anarchy, State and Utopia". Although, I highly doubt you will investigate this wiki entry: http://en.wikipedia....ate,_and_Utopia Kid? *snicker* I haven't been a kid for quite some time. I also have found that those that think they know more, because they are "educated"...... are those that are least likely to actually understand the human aspect of the problem. I have also found, in my own education, that what they teach, and what actually happens in the real world, are two entirely different things. (Yes, I have funny little letters after my name too. Doesn't mean diddly squat.) One question though, when has "not understanding the implications/impact of an action" EVER stopped a government from doing something? When has actually understanding the cost/benefits of an action EVER caused a group of individualists to DO something??? Ponder that one for a while. For me, I don't really feel like "debating" with the "I be edumacated, therefore, I am smarter than you" types. I'm out. Have fun guys.

Unofficial patch doesn't do anything with follower arrows. What other mods do you have installed? Duke Patricks combat mods perhaps?

So while they may not call their power hierarchy "government", or "the state" that is, in fact, what it amounts to in any event...... so, not really anarchy at all. Which, again, is human nature, and why I don't believe that anarchy is this sense can work with a large group.

Did you customize your controls?

WB will only show installers for mods that you actually used BAIN to install. :) So, perfectly normal.

See the thread stickied at the top of this forum for removing unwanted effects..... fix is in there.

May wanna post here instead.

Give them a couple days. And here is yet another reason NOT to have a SINGLE PLAYER game tied to Steam...... too bad beth won't listen.

Set up a profile for skyrim launcher in your nvidia control panel. See if the card then becomes active when you start the game. (delete your skyrim.ini in My Games\Skyrim folder before starting the launcher again.)

Your argument is full of fallacious assumptions about the necessity of a state. You are assuming without the state that particular and arbitrary things won't get accomplished. This was the same argument they made in defense of slavery by stating "without slavery, who will pick the cotton?" except now many statists bellow "without the government, who will build the roads?". As Murray Rothbard once said, the statist confuses the necessity of SOCIETY with the necessity of the STATE. I'd recommend watching this: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=0H2rSJayL_c Is it? Show me ONE significantly sized group of people that without help of a government, constructed roads, bridges, a police force, fire department, or even a friggin hospital. Saying the state is REQUIRED to do all of these things is not only juvenile but simply laughable. Aside from the moral reasons in opposition to the state, the economic arguments are quite basic. The state is incapable of calculating the opportunity costs of production and has no way of calculating, economically, where the most efficient use of resources should be directed. Both of these problems result in an extremely high level of inefficiency in providing even the most basic of services. Look up the Icelandic Commonwealth (Medieval Iceland). This "significantly sized" group as you put had private defense agencies instead of a monopoly police force as well as what is now referred to as private law or private dispute resolution. A very good read from David Friedman: http://www.daviddfri...nd/Iceland.html If you want to resort to insults, you can be added to my ignore list with a few quick clicks. Also, running off a line of feces is not an argument. None of what you discuss there matters one whit to the state, or the people. The people want roads to drive on. Individually, they are going to be unable to build the infrastructure required for such a project. convincing enough folks that it is a 'good idea' is one thing, getting the to do, let alone PAY FOR IT, is an entirely separate issue. Also, your argument falls flat in the face of american history. The US government started the interstate system to ENCOURAGE commerce, and make it easier to transport goods around the country. They KNEW it would be a boon to the economy, both in the jobs created by the projects themselves, and the commerce they enabled. No problem, I can give you five off the top of my head: Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia. I'll even describe one for you: Croatia is built like that, 4.5 million people who live on a private property of foreign companies. Politicians do nothing but bark at each other and they have no real power since everything inside the border is owned by someone else, even the border. All of our road repairs and road/bridge constructions are funded and controlled by German private companies and are built without any consent from the government (our highways don't even have a building license but they are still built and used), same goes for the fire department. Hospitals are funded and controlled by Pliva, who is in turn controlled by US and German pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Bayer. Police force is controlled my the Ministry of Internal Affairs which does nothing if NATO doesn't request it, it's funded by US and is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. http://forums.nexusmods.com/public/style_emoticons/dark/rolleyes.gif Hotels - foreign, clinics - foreign, hospitals - foreign, police - foreign, sea - foreign, land - foreign, electrical company - foreign, phone companies - foreign, water company - foreign, roads - foreign, oil company - foreign, military - foreign, government - exists but politicians do nothing whatsoever but sit on their arse and get payed for doing nothing. Nothing in Croatia is owned by it's government and they don't help anyone but themselves. Also, half the government is in prison for theft, bribery, smuggling, murder, extortion, racketeering, war profiteering, threatening, etc. http://forums.nexusmods.com/public/style_emoticons/dark/laugh.gif The same situation is in the other four countries I mentioned, they just have a different name. So you see, you don't need a government for the state to function. http://forums.nexusmods.com/public/style_emoticons/dark/biggrin.gif No, you need foreign governments, and private companies operating at the behest of same.... How is that in any way considered "Anarchy"?

How are you launching the game now?

Your argument is full of fallacious assumptions about the necessity of a state. You are assuming without the state that particular and arbitrary things won't get accomplished. This was the same argument they made in defense of slavery by stating "without slavery, who will pick the cotton?" except now many statists bellow "without the government, who will build the roads?". As Murray Rothbard once said, the statist confuses the necessity of SOCIETY with the necessity of the STATE. I'd recommend watching this: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=0H2rSJayL_c Is it? Show me ONE significantly sized group of people that without help of a government, constructed roads, bridges, a police force, fire department, or even a friggin hospital.

Initially, it wasn't possible to add new animations to oblivion either.... but modders found a way.

Fixed that for ya. :D

Boss will automagically assign the tags, no worries there. The dirty edits should be cleaned with TESVEdit. You can download it from skyrim nexus, and on the description page (I think) is the procedure for cleaning mods. (if not in the description, will certainly be in the docs that come with it.) It's a lot like Wrye Bash, looks complicated, is very powerful, but, if you follow the directions, works great. Dirty Edits can be something as simple as an "Identical to Master" record. Basically, its a record that was 'touched' unintentionally, and thus, the CK marked it as 'changed'. Can cause some issues, and should be dealt with.

Boss will give the error messages whether you have the fixes in place or not. If you have the fixes already, don't worry about the errors.

Think I have seen this flavor of thread before, but, here goes anyway.... :D No. It can't. Human nature won't allow it. There MUST be someone 'in charge', else, things go to hades in a handbasket. No major infrastructure, no collective organizations for the public safety, (fire, police) and no central authority to deter crime. Granted, if everyone has a gun...... that would be somewhat of a deterrent, but, I don't think significant enough. And that's just internal issues. When you start dealing with the rest of the world, doing so on an individual basis would be a major nightmare.

Trouble is, 64 pit operating systems didn't become real popular until recently.... (about half way between vista, and 7....) Now though, I am not seeing many machines that AREN'T 64 bit..... I run Skyrim on an older machine, AMD X4 965 Black, stock clocks, HD 6850 1gb, 4gp RAM, and a 7200RPM IDE HDD..... and 64 bit Win XP Pro. My game runs pretty good, and doesn't crash. At all. I don't remember the last time that it DID crash while playing..... I get some microstutter, but, aside from that, the game is eminently playable. Of course, this is a rig built pretty much specifically for gaming, so, a lot of the windows 'pretties' are disabled, along with useless services. (Yes, I am looking at YOU Window Wireless zero config.... I don't have a wireless network adapter, so why in hades would I need the service?) It isn't JUST about what hardware you have. It's the entire system setup that needs to be looked at. If you have a dozen little icons in your system tray, it's no wonder your gaming experience is somewhat less than satisfactory.

Your monitor isn't the problem, I suspect your video card is...... it is either overheating, or the driver is crashing. Knowing what vid card you have would be a good place to start, and what driver version you are using.

Try running the game without warzones, and see what happens.

Use only NEW hard saves. No auto, or quick saves. At All. Play for a while. See if any issues crop up.