Heterosexual Pride mod taken down

[dferstat]

 

But anyway. Care to expand on the whole "trumper" and "maga" insinuations there, dferstat?

 

No need. I think I made my point clear enough.

 

 

Have you noticed that aside from me providing linkage to the rules, that you're the only one who feels any kind of need to substantiate your moral high ground?

I really haven't seen anybody else here, have to go to the length of saying "THIS is why I'M right!"

 

It's probably too far back for you to remember, but this thread started with people wondering WHY the mod in question was hidden. In my post, I owned to my contributions, and gave my reasons for doing so.

 

Since then, you've continued to make statements that are objectively incorrect. Because your statements have the power to misinform others, and to reinforce dangerous myths, I've taken the time to rebut them.

 

 

And no, I don't expect to change your mind; you've demonstrated that you're impervious to logic, or to new facts that don't fit your world-view.

 

However, I want those people who still have an open mind to see the evidence, in the hope that, once informed, they'll reach conclusions based upon fact, rather than lies.

[HeyYou]

 

 

But anyway. Care to expand on the whole "trumper" and "maga" insinuations there, dferstat?

 

No need. I think I made my point clear enough.

 

 

Have you noticed that aside from me providing linkage to the rules, that you're the only one who feels any kind of need to substantiate your moral high ground?

I really haven't seen anybody else here, have to go to the length of saying "THIS is why I'M right!"

 

It's probably too far back for you to remember, but this thread started with people wondering WHY the mod in question was hidden. In my post, I owned to my contributions, and gave my reasons for doing so.

 

Since then, you've continued to make statements that are objectively incorrect. Because your statements have the power to misinform others, and to reinforce dangerous myths, I've taken the time to rebut them.

 

 

And no, I don't expect to change your mind; you've demonstrated that you're impervious to logic, or to new facts that don't fit your world-view.

 

However, I want those people who still have an open mind to see the evidence, in the hope that, once informed, they'll reach conclusions based upon fact, rather than lies.

 

I invite you to look in the mirror, as all of those statements apply to you as well. You have your view, you feel you are right, and therefore, you feel the need to denigrate anything/anyone that has a differing view. Which is absolutely expected. Thankyouverymuchgoodnight.

[dferstat]

 

I invite you to look in the mirror, as all of those statements apply to you as well.

 

 

Except, of course, that they don't. I keep asking you, and StormWolf01, to provide some evidence to support your claims. You two keep not doing so.

 

If my statements, as you insist, are factually incorrect, then PROVE IT.

[StormWolf01]

 

 

 

But anyway. Care to expand on the whole "trumper" and "maga" insinuations there, dferstat?

 

No need. I think I made my point clear enough.

 

 

Have you noticed that aside from me providing linkage to the rules, that you're the only one who feels any kind of need to substantiate your moral high ground?

I really haven't seen anybody else here, have to go to the length of saying "THIS is why I'M right!"

 

It's probably too far back for you to remember, but this thread started with people wondering WHY the mod in question was hidden. In my post, I owned to my contributions, and gave my reasons for doing so.

 

Since then, you've continued to make statements that are objectively incorrect. Because your statements have the power to misinform others, and to reinforce dangerous myths, I've taken the time to rebut them.

 

 

And no, I don't expect to change your mind; you've demonstrated that you're impervious to logic, or to new facts that don't fit your world-view.

 

However, I want those people who still have an open mind to see the evidence, in the hope that, once informed, they'll reach conclusions based upon fact, rather than lies.

 

 

I invite you to look in the mirror, as all of those statements apply to you as well. You have your view, you feel you are right, and therefore, you feel the need to denigrate anything/anyone that has a differing view. Which is absolutely expected. Thankyouverymuchgoodnight.

 

 

Yup, pretty much my thoughts too.

 

 

 

I invite you to look in the mirror, as all of those statements apply to you as well.

 

 

Except, of course, that they don't. I keep asking you, and StormWolf01, to provide some evidence to support your claims. You two keep not doing so.

 

If my statements, as you insist, are factually incorrect, then PROVE IT.

 

1) We are secure enough in our beliefs that we see no need to do so.

2) We have no need to feel a moral high ground, for what we're saying.

3) Check your privilege if you think that you can make demands on other members of the nexus. That doesn't fly well here.

[Guest deleted34304850]

Hilarious.

[dferstat]

StormWolf01 and HeyYou say:

 

[PhanomGames]

God this thread makes me excited to vote for trump again in 2020, if only to piss you guys off. I'm probably one of the most "far right" people on this board, and the misconceptions people have are staggering.

 

This mod was merely pointing out hypocrisy and it delivered perfectly. I couldn't care less about whether or not gay pride mods are allowed, and really, couldn't care less about the straight pride mod as well.

 

I'm a free speech absolutist, however, that also applies to private companies as well. What it comes down to is that Nexus has the right to be hypocritical and only allow 1 class of pride mod.

 

While a bias is certainly worth pointing out on the community forums, anyone demanding they change their policy is way too easily offended, or doesnt value the open market.

[dferstat]

I'm a free speech absolutist ...

 

Hmm ... how do you stand on the the old test of shouting 'Fire!" in a crowded theatre? Do you hold for free speech, even when such speech is objectively harmful? How do you stand on incitement to violence, perjury, food labelling, slander, and the manipulation of stock prices?

[PhanomGames]

 

I'm a free speech absolutist ...

Â

Hmm ... how do you stand on the the old test of shouting 'Fire!" in a crowded theatre? Do you hold for free speech, even when such speech is objectively harmful? How do you stand on incitement to violence, perjury, food labelling, slander, and the manipulation of stock prices?

Bad formatting because mobile, and using swype

 

I think if a theater wanted to allow shouting fire in a crowded movie theater it should be allowed. Of course, insurance might disagree with that and find the theater liable if someone gets injured.

 

I think objectively harmful speech including incitement to violence should absolutely be protected. Same with slander.

 

Perjury is a bit different because you undergo the process of swearing in. I don't think the state should have the right to force sometime to swear in though, and if not sworn in then perjury should be permissable.

 

I don't think the stock market should be regulated. trading laws are a joke (I've had an account frozen by the sec before).

 

Food labeling must conform to facts about what you're purchasing obviously. As for unregulated health claims, they're not a big deal. Basically sums up the entire supplement market.

[HadToRegister]

Hhhmmm, the forums don't seem to want to post what I typed...... Not sure what that's all about. But, no real loss I suppose. Arguing these particular points with someone on a forum, that doesn't live here, has no clue about our society or culture, and is just another one of the 'progressive liberals' that needs a cause to forward, is waste of time, and effort. I oppose the whole 'gay rights' movement, as a demand by the alphabet crowd for MORE rights, than the MAJORITY. Another cause that is dragging society further down the drain. Wonderful.

 

In any event, I have had about as much of this type of stupidity as I can stomache, so, I'm out. Enjoy your delusions, and your uphill battle.

 

 

Just STOP, seriously, they were just granted EQUAL RIGHTS, it's the Right Wing Conservatives who immediately demand MORE RIGHTS, with their Religious Freedom Laws, because they cannot stand anybody being EQUAL to them, so they get their Conservative Legislature to make up BS R'Religious Freedom" laws so they can resume discriminating the LGBT community.

 

The LGBT community isn't getting MORE rights, they were given the SAME Rights that YOU have been enjoying in America for your entire life.

 

How do you even think that someone getting EQUAL Rights is somehow getting MORE rights than you already have?

Seriously, do tell.