Pickysaurus

As showler says, what you're describing is essentially profiles. You can also enable profile-specific saved games for Bethesda titles to keep the saves separate.

Hi there, Thanks for doing the tests. I can see you have a similar problem to another user in Hong Kong. (https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?/topic/11610043-nexus-cdn-down/) I'm afraid this looks like an ISP or routing issue, so my only suggestions are to report it to your ISP or try a VPN.

Here's a little snip from our Moderation Policy. The policy also explains that we don't allow public discussion of moderation either, so if you have an issue with how your mod was handled you can send us a complaint here: https://help.nexusmods.com/article/27-moderation-policy#Complaints_Regarding_Moderation

This may be something that you'll have to report to your ISP as a fault I'm afraid. They may be able to diagnose the issue more thoroughly.

Your post is completely unrelated to the OP. Please don't hijack threads. You can make a new topic in the SSE support forum here: https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?/forum/4021-skyrim-special-edition

This thread has unfortunately become very unconstructive very quickly. While I understand the OP's original point, it seems to have turned into a bit of a rant beyond that. Mod authors aren't obligated to provide support with their mods and have the choice to include the comment section on the page or not. If they don't have comments enabled, you can always post in the relevant game forum for assistance.

I'm afraid we have no control over this. As the error says, you should contact your bank/payment provider if they are denying the transaction. If your bank won't let you pay directly, the PayPal option might work instead.

Could you post your download test results as explained in the troubleshooting article? As you're the only one reporting it, I'm afraid there's a high chance it's a problem on your end.

victor7bet banned Reason: Another silly spammer attempting to post a mod page full of spam links. Reference post

MorganB1ackhand banned Reason: Uploading high suspicious files in a spammy manner. Reference post Reference post

MarryGordon banned Reason: Uploading spam to an unapproved mod page. Which is super dumb because nobody saw it. Reference post

hesoyami123 banned Reason: Piracy of Valheim Reference post

When it comes to using voices from other games, as the voice is sampled for the original content, I would refer to the game dev's policy on using their assets in other games.

Hi there, You cannot change the selected country, it is automatically detected. Could you perhaps expand on why this is a problem for you? If you're using a VPN, turn it off during the purchase to ensure your country is detected correctly.

Glad to hear the VPN worked. This may be something to report to your ISP to see if they can understand why you were having this problem.

SaiyansRasengan banned Reason: Sharing a stolen mod that features sexualised (nude) depictions of child characters from Demon Slayer -Kimetsu no Yaiba- The Hinokami Chronicles. Knowingly uploading a mod without permission from or credit to the original author. Admitting to having stolen it publicly on the mod page. Reference post

Did you complete the server tests? The reason I ask is that they all say 10MB/s - which is the default value in our troubleshooting template.

There was an outage at CloudFlare which impacted a lot of websites. We should be back online now, but things may be a little slow for a few minutes.

victorinaquezon banned Reference post

cms061 banned Reason: Emailed Nexus Mods support to request help modding a pirated game. We have a strict anti-piracy policy and will take proactive action against anyone whose on-site activity gives us reasonable grounds to believe they are using pirated content such as, but not limited to, games and software. Discussing, promoting or distributing such content on our sites will be met with administrative action.

TheMightyQuinn1 banned Reason: Banned due to a chargeback on a Premium Membership. This is standard procedure when someone purchases Premium Membership then issues a chargeback with the payment processor without first contacting support at Nexus Mods about whatever issue they may have had. If you are this user, please contact us and explain why you initiated the chargeback.

It's a server response, to it'd happen from any application making the same web request. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/429 It sounds like you've used all of your API key requests for the given time period. If that is the case, you must've done an absolute tonne of downloading in a 24hr period. https://help.nexusmods.com/article/105-i-have-reached-a-daily-or-hourly-limit-api-requests-have-been-consumed-rate-limit-exceeded-what-does-this-mean

Hey nokturnihs, Thanks for providing your perspective, I'll do my best to answer your initial questions, then pick out anything else from the thread since. While the intent is good, some of the community answers here aren't entirely accurate. The first thing I need to point out is that you're actually referring to two separate things there, the Collections system itself which is an alpha feature designed and maintained by the team here at Nexus Mods and secondly the Cyberpunk 2077 game extension which is maintained by an awesome team of community developers (Kellie and her team). In the later case, they've been super receptive to constructive feedback around problems installing mods with the extension and have worked really hard to keep it updated with the current formats used by the community. I do understand where you are coming from with this. The point of Collections is very much to allow users to share a curated list of their recommended mods. Obviously unlike a YouTube video or a forum post containing a list, we provide the ability to automate the downloading, installing and conflict management to get the users set up properly. If you're saying that installing the same mods with Vortex without using Collections results in a different end-product than doing it via a Collection that does seem odd to me. It may be the curator of the list has done something weird. I'd need examples of this really to say more. Just as with mods, we do not hand curate the content shared through Collections. However, we do provide the community the means to give feedback on each Collection to signal to other users if it works or not. 12 hours after installing a collection Vortex will pop up and ask "did this work as expected?", that vote is then tallied into the "Success rating" you can see both on the tile on the list page and on the collection page itself. We have identified some weaknesses with this current implementation. Specifically in that with each new revision the rating resets, so it makes it a bit hard to find good or bad collections if they are updated often and the rating gets set back to 0. We have work underway to improve this by having a "recent" and "overall" rating (similar to Steam), so if over the last x weeks/months the rating has been mostly negative, it will not be as easy to "shrug off" that rating by simply uploading a fresh revision. Once we release these changes, the hope is that low quality content will simply slip down in the ratings and allow users to find better content more quickly. Can you give some examples of collections which require manual edits post-install? Vortex should be able to cater for most of this, we're also looking at including Binary Patching to allow curators to ship slightly modified mod files with their collections to automate some of the small tweaks that often need to be made. This may also be something the extension guys need to know about if it can be done programmatically. Finally, the instructions provided during install are another point of weakness we've identified (thanks to feedback from users testing the system) and we're currently working through some designs to improve the way instructions are presented to the user. I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean here. At present the only way to submit a Collection to the site is to have it installed and configured in your local instance of Vortex. The reason for this is that we expect the curator to actually set up all the mods to work together before exporting it for others to use. Unfortunately, if the collection don't work, it's either that the curator didn't test it properly or they picked some options during the upload of the data which result in a different end result to what they have on their machine. In the case of the later, I'd be interested to learn what caused this decisions so we can improve the UI/UX of curating a collection. In regards to FOMODs, to correct what showler said, this isn't a Bethesda-only feature. It's something Vortex supports for any game, but it's up to modders in the given community to adopt this format. A brief tutorial is available here: https://modding.wiki/en/vortex/users/How-to-create-mod-installers This is mostly covered above, but I understand the part about comments. Please keep in mind that the entire system is still in alpha and is unfinished. The comments being on the forum is definitely not ideal. We are currently working to ease these pains though. We're building a brand new bug reporting system for Collection pages at the moment, it's taking shape fairly well but isn't ready to be released to the world yet. Once bug reports are implemented the next big feature is going to be to build a comments system inside Nexus Mods Next which will allow them to be shown on the page itself. At this point we can ditch the forum threads and make it easier to browse comments before downloading. Both of these features will also serve as a basis for updated versions of the features found on mod pages too. In short, there will be some pain points over the next few months and that's actually great. It allows us to understand the problems with the system and better tailor it to the needs of the community. Much of what you pointed out is already on our roadmap but the feedback further enforces that we're going in the right direction. I would say that you just need to give us a bit of time and patience to get everything we're building in place and they we can see if they have properly addressed your concerns. If you haven't already seen it, we've got a FAQ for Collections here too: https://modding.wiki/en/nexusmods/collections/FAQ

JuosKaulai banned Reason: Previously banned user: enjoyer69, ctsmoke, witcherfan22 Reference post Reference post Reference post

Sentinel199 has received a formal warning. This user has now received 1 formal warnings. The warning was given for the following reason: Reference This warning was issued for what took place here Restrictions in place As part of the warning, Sentinel199 has had the following restrictions placed on his or her account: This user cannot post comments on the sites or forums for 7 days Important links: Our terms of service