Pickysaurus

When it comes to using voices from other games, as the voice is sampled for the original content, I would refer to the game dev's policy on using their assets in other games.

Hi there, You cannot change the selected country, it is automatically detected. Could you perhaps expand on why this is a problem for you? If you're using a VPN, turn it off during the purchase to ensure your country is detected correctly.

Glad to hear the VPN worked. This may be something to report to your ISP to see if they can understand why you were having this problem.

SaiyansRasengan banned Reason: Sharing a stolen mod that features sexualised (nude) depictions of child characters from Demon Slayer -Kimetsu no Yaiba- The Hinokami Chronicles. Knowingly uploading a mod without permission from or credit to the original author. Admitting to having stolen it publicly on the mod page. Reference post

Did you complete the server tests? The reason I ask is that they all say 10MB/s - which is the default value in our troubleshooting template.

There was an outage at CloudFlare which impacted a lot of websites. We should be back online now, but things may be a little slow for a few minutes.

victorinaquezon banned Reference post

cms061 banned Reason: Emailed Nexus Mods support to request help modding a pirated game. We have a strict anti-piracy policy and will take proactive action against anyone whose on-site activity gives us reasonable grounds to believe they are using pirated content such as, but not limited to, games and software. Discussing, promoting or distributing such content on our sites will be met with administrative action.

TheMightyQuinn1 banned Reason: Banned due to a chargeback on a Premium Membership. This is standard procedure when someone purchases Premium Membership then issues a chargeback with the payment processor without first contacting support at Nexus Mods about whatever issue they may have had. If you are this user, please contact us and explain why you initiated the chargeback.

It's a server response, to it'd happen from any application making the same web request. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/429 It sounds like you've used all of your API key requests for the given time period. If that is the case, you must've done an absolute tonne of downloading in a 24hr period. https://help.nexusmods.com/article/105-i-have-reached-a-daily-or-hourly-limit-api-requests-have-been-consumed-rate-limit-exceeded-what-does-this-mean

Hey nokturnihs, Thanks for providing your perspective, I'll do my best to answer your initial questions, then pick out anything else from the thread since. While the intent is good, some of the community answers here aren't entirely accurate. The first thing I need to point out is that you're actually referring to two separate things there, the Collections system itself which is an alpha feature designed and maintained by the team here at Nexus Mods and secondly the Cyberpunk 2077 game extension which is maintained by an awesome team of community developers (Kellie and her team). In the later case, they've been super receptive to constructive feedback around problems installing mods with the extension and have worked really hard to keep it updated with the current formats used by the community. I do understand where you are coming from with this. The point of Collections is very much to allow users to share a curated list of their recommended mods. Obviously unlike a YouTube video or a forum post containing a list, we provide the ability to automate the downloading, installing and conflict management to get the users set up properly. If you're saying that installing the same mods with Vortex without using Collections results in a different end-product than doing it via a Collection that does seem odd to me. It may be the curator of the list has done something weird. I'd need examples of this really to say more. Just as with mods, we do not hand curate the content shared through Collections. However, we do provide the community the means to give feedback on each Collection to signal to other users if it works or not. 12 hours after installing a collection Vortex will pop up and ask "did this work as expected?", that vote is then tallied into the "Success rating" you can see both on the tile on the list page and on the collection page itself. We have identified some weaknesses with this current implementation. Specifically in that with each new revision the rating resets, so it makes it a bit hard to find good or bad collections if they are updated often and the rating gets set back to 0. We have work underway to improve this by having a "recent" and "overall" rating (similar to Steam), so if over the last x weeks/months the rating has been mostly negative, it will not be as easy to "shrug off" that rating by simply uploading a fresh revision. Once we release these changes, the hope is that low quality content will simply slip down in the ratings and allow users to find better content more quickly. Can you give some examples of collections which require manual edits post-install? Vortex should be able to cater for most of this, we're also looking at including Binary Patching to allow curators to ship slightly modified mod files with their collections to automate some of the small tweaks that often need to be made. This may also be something the extension guys need to know about if it can be done programmatically. Finally, the instructions provided during install are another point of weakness we've identified (thanks to feedback from users testing the system) and we're currently working through some designs to improve the way instructions are presented to the user. I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean here. At present the only way to submit a Collection to the site is to have it installed and configured in your local instance of Vortex. The reason for this is that we expect the curator to actually set up all the mods to work together before exporting it for others to use. Unfortunately, if the collection don't work, it's either that the curator didn't test it properly or they picked some options during the upload of the data which result in a different end result to what they have on their machine. In the case of the later, I'd be interested to learn what caused this decisions so we can improve the UI/UX of curating a collection. In regards to FOMODs, to correct what showler said, this isn't a Bethesda-only feature. It's something Vortex supports for any game, but it's up to modders in the given community to adopt this format. A brief tutorial is available here: https://modding.wiki/en/vortex/users/How-to-create-mod-installers This is mostly covered above, but I understand the part about comments. Please keep in mind that the entire system is still in alpha and is unfinished. The comments being on the forum is definitely not ideal. We are currently working to ease these pains though. We're building a brand new bug reporting system for Collection pages at the moment, it's taking shape fairly well but isn't ready to be released to the world yet. Once bug reports are implemented the next big feature is going to be to build a comments system inside Nexus Mods Next which will allow them to be shown on the page itself. At this point we can ditch the forum threads and make it easier to browse comments before downloading. Both of these features will also serve as a basis for updated versions of the features found on mod pages too. In short, there will be some pain points over the next few months and that's actually great. It allows us to understand the problems with the system and better tailor it to the needs of the community. Much of what you pointed out is already on our roadmap but the feedback further enforces that we're going in the right direction. I would say that you just need to give us a bit of time and patience to get everything we're building in place and they we can see if they have properly addressed your concerns. If you haven't already seen it, we've got a FAQ for Collections here too: https://modding.wiki/en/nexusmods/collections/FAQ

JuosKaulai banned Reason: Previously banned user: enjoyer69, ctsmoke, witcherfan22 Reference post Reference post Reference post

Sentinel199 has received a formal warning. This user has now received 1 formal warnings. The warning was given for the following reason: Reference This warning was issued for what took place here Restrictions in place As part of the warning, Sentinel199 has had the following restrictions placed on his or her account: This user cannot post comments on the sites or forums for 7 days Important links: Our terms of service

sergiobrasileiro banned Reason: Posting a mod for The Sims 4 that enables allows "teens" character to be used in the Wicked Whims sex mod and enabled incest. Reference post

sanktum1526789 banned Reason: Uploading malware disguised as a Skyrim Mod Reference post

Venzort banned Reason: Throwaway account created specifically to upload malware disguised as a Fallout 4 mod Reference post

kuangsam banned Reason: Upload a mod featuring a nude child (Rose Winters from Resident Evil Village, 16 years old). https://help.nexusmods.com/article/28-file-submission-guidelines#Content_related_to_Child_characters Reference post

Alright. Did you read my post above yours? It's a known problem and fixes itself after a while.

I've turned off the restriction for now. Obviously, if it gets abused I'll have to turn it back on but we'll see how it goes.

I added a limit to my own signature size and I can replicate the issue. It happened for both an Imgur link and an image from our own site. So I can only assume that something is wrong in the forum's validation of images. I will see if this can be fixed or disabled.

Unless I'm missing something, the game for your mod has been approved: https://www.nexusmods.com/maddennfl22/mods/1 You created the page yesterday and it was approved today - at least that's what the page logs are telling me.

It is annoying. I have a feeling it might be down to browser settings/addons (you'd be surprised how many things these break!). I've been poking around in the admin area and I can't even find any settings for signatures. Edit: Found the settings, but there's nothing to them other than settings the x and y sizes.

This came up a few days ago. https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?/topic/11547623-another-signature-image-problem/ I'm not sure what exactly is wrong with the form to submit it yourself as I don't get that error as an admin. I've set your signature manually.

f*#@it123 banned Reason: Inappropriate username

iShaDoWxHunter banned Reason: Homophobic remarks. 05 January 2022, 11:02PM "LesbianBear" "Just as a note, I'm a Lesbian"-Parolebaby's bio. Are you both so deranged that you view what enters your dusty holes as part of your personal identity? Are people this pathetic. Do you see people with a straight flag? People that place "straight" in their bios or nametags? No. It's all attention seeking. 05 January 2022, 11:12PM This is a stupid argument. "ThAT MoD eXiSt tHeReFoRE tHiS oNe JuStIfIeD ://" The fact that you know about such mods tells me all I need to know abut what degenerate behaviour your community represents. 05 January 2022, 11:20PM (wall of text) 07 January 2022, 1:33AM Ah yes a mod is homophobic, idiots. It's your game, you can play it however you want, if you think otherwise you so 'tolerant' people, guess what? Then you're a BIGOT! Playing a straight character doesn't make you homophobic, the sheer level of stupidity in your comment,just shows me why humanity deserves to go extinct. Play a straight PC, play a gay PC. It doesn't matter. Geez 07 January 2022 - 12:51 PM I love that my comments keep getting deleted. I'm not even saying anything insulting, all I said was look at the posts here versus another mod's posts. I know it's a Nexus moderator(not the mod author) that's doing it, it's any comment I make about any mod. How weak and insecure and these Nexus moderators be? 27 February 2022 - 12:40 PM What does Ukraine have to do with skyrim mods?!? 09 June 2022 - 05:27 PM (pertaining mod not downloaded): Why no straight one? 10 June 2022 - 11:32 AM (pertaining mod not downloaded) in response to post #110258098: It definitely beats a *nationality* flag and a shitty *nationality* flag. Reference post Reference post Reference post Reference post Reference post Reference post Reference post