Mod Browsing Overhaul Discussion

[HadToRegister]

48 minutes ago, WndMll said:

REMINDER THAT SOME PEOPLE HAVE BAD/IMPAIRED EYESIGHT AND THE NEW UI IS ACTIVELY DETRIMENTAL. THE NEW LOOK MUST AT BARE MINIMUM BE BROUGHT CLOSER IN SPACING AND COLOUR SCHEME TO THE LAST VERSION OF THE UI WE HAD. IT IS NOT ONLY AN IT'S UGLY THING.

Just to chime in here about Vision issues. I have Retinopathy, so for me, text that fits in between my 'gray spots' are much easier to see, than a huge thumbnail that looks like it has a bunch of holes in it.
Also, constant bright colors like in the overly large thumbnails can trigger “Ocular Migraines” which make it difficult, if not impossible, for me to see, for around 20–30 minutes while it's happening.
For people wondering what that looks like...

That (shown below) goes on and on and on, in both eyes, it starts from a small point, and grows and grows, it's like having constantly flashing Christmas lights inside your eyes for around 20–30 minutes, which eventually ends with a really bad and painful migraine in at least one eye for me.

[tinchek]

First things first, I want missing features back and hopefully updated. As of 21.03.2025, 22:52 CET, the ability to enter a date range is missing while browsing mods. You can pick between a few preset dates, but that's inadequate. What if some state-of-the-art best mod ever was published just 366 days ago? Then, if I sort mods by endorsements and put in "1 Year" date range, I won't ever find that mod.

also, I think an invaluable addition would be a Date Updated date range. because now when browsing fallout 4 mods by endorsements, over half of them haven't been updated in over 5, 6 or even 9 years. and the last update for fallout 4 was in May 13, 2024. the ability to sort mods by date published from that date forward and sort them by endorsements or by number of downloads would be huge for mod discovery. Steam Workshop does it. they in fact let you enter both date published and date updated dates at the same time. sure it could result in zero items/mods, if you are not paying attention but I have faith in our userbase.

[HollownessDevoured]

2 hours ago, showler said:

For pineapple?   Mostly in Canada, I think.

Canadian here, pineapple on pizza is an abomination. 

[jmharris]

14 minutes ago, tinchek said:

As of 21.03.2025, 22:52 CET, the ability to enter a date range is missing while browsing mods.

https://forums.nexusmods.com/topic/13507498-mod-browsing-overhaul-discussion/page/119/#comment-130498579

[jmharris]

45 minutes ago, Leo77 said:

Why did you remove the custom time range?

The justification is all laid out in the first post of this thread! Along with: "We won’t always get things right the first time — this is an iterative process of improvements"

I can confirm the date range search is being worked on.

[showler]

46 minutes ago, Leo77 said:

It should become common practice to sack web designers after the site is up and running to prevent this insanity of constantly reinventing the wheel to justify their job position, so many sites keep degrading like this.

Once again, this wasn't a "make work" project.  The people who worked on this were literally hired for the express purpose of creating this update.  Robin wanted the site updated, Robin hired people to update the site, those people did the job according to Robin's requirements and with his approval.

This was a long-term project, not some scam that nefarious people pulled on Robin.

[jmharris]

12 minutes ago, HollownessDevoured said:

pineapple on pizza is an abomination. 

I like it, so long as the gaps between the pineapple chunks aren't too large.

[showler]

14 minutes ago, HollownessDevoured said:

Canadian here, pineapple on pizza is an abomination. 

We invented it.  We have to take responsibility for it.

[UX99]

1 minute ago, jmharris said:

The justification is all laid out in the first post of this thread! Along with: "We won’t always get things right the first time — this is an iterative process of improvements"

I can confirm the date range search is being worked on.

 

Then there are much better ways to do this than a major downgrade citing "positive results from the people who actually opted in" as the only reason.

The majority of people that have since posted about this after it has gone live have pretty much all been about how bad it is. Any feedback has been ignored or even dismissed with hostility.

 

Just the amount of condescension from this:
 

Quote

 

Thanks for the feedback.

We disagree and aren't at this time looking for further input from UX professionals.

 

 

Runs against the idea of "this is an iterative process of improvement".

 

Even the stats provided elsewhere on the polling breakdown doesn't actually paint it as "universally liked".

 

 

[Leo77]

9 minutes ago, jmharris said:

The justification is all laid out in the first post of this thread! Along with: "We won’t always get things right the first time — this is an iterative process of improvements"

I can confirm the date range search is being worked on.

You'll be iterating for a long time if this is the starting line.