Pickysaurus

Xeno152 has received a formal warning. This user has now received 1 formal warnings. The warning was given for the following reason: Reference This warning was issued for what took place here Restrictions in place As part of the warning, Xeno152 has had the following restrictions placed on his or her account: This user cannot post comments on the sites or forums for 7 days Important links: Our terms of service

I'm not really sure you can blame Collections for this. If anything the Collections system would see an increase in downloads, but a slight drop-off in page views. To add to this I'm not even sure your mod is included in any Collections at the moment? I notice your only recent mod is for Skyrim 2011, so I would say the decline of a mixture of the following factors. The Skyrim "LE" player base has been declining slowly ever since Skyrim SE came out. Most players are now on the new version of the game. With less players for the old game, your download counts would being heading down too. Collections are also a clear indicator that Skyrim LE isn't that popular anymore with only 4 Collections versus 120+ for SE. The mod hasn't been updated since 2019, so anyone who is interested in it may already have it. Older mods are also somewhat harder to find on the site (there's not a great solution for that). It's getting towards summer in the Northern hemisphere (where most of the Nexus Mods users live) so people are more likely to be doing things other than playing on PC.COVID restrictions worldwide are being relaxed. Similar to the above, less people are stuck inside and may be taking a break from gaming. It's possible your mod was listed in some kind of modding guide hosted off site (in a YouTube video or just some random forum) which lead to the spike in 2019, but it has since either been removed from the guide or the guide itself no longer exists. I imply this from the same spike in April 2019 on the mod your patch requires. Put simply, I think you're misplacing the "blame" with Collections - this seems like a coincidence in timing. Correlation does not always imply causation.

NewLandsMods72 banned Reason: An alternative account of Colemanallen1987. Reuploading your content that is in moderation on your main account for permission violations. Reference post

Colemanallen1987 has received a formal warning. This user has now received 1 formal warnings. The warning was given for the following reason: Reference This warning was issued for what took place here, here Restrictions in place As part of the warning, Colemanallen1987 has had the following restrictions placed on his or her account: This user cannot upload files for 14 days Important links: Our terms of service

In response to post #108356823. You should comment on the extension page, not in this article.

Ashen009 has received a formal warning. This user has now received 1 formal warnings. The warning was given for the following reason: Reference This warning was issued for what took place here, here Restrictions in place As part of the warning, Ashen009 has had the following restrictions placed on his or her account: This user cannot upload images to the Image Share for 7 days Important links: Our terms of service

Thanks for the confirmation. If it's not redirecting properly when you have 2FA disabled then that's a new bug. I'll raise it with the team.

phucknexusmodz banned Reason: Inappropriate username. Your comment would have been answered if you'd simply read the description page too. "How do i download this f*#@lng file? My god this site sucks so much ass" Reference post

For some reason I can't load Imgur links from our office right now, but I think I know the screen you're referring to. It's something we hope to improve at some point.

Gryzleyy banned Reason: Ban evasion. Given away by the genius decision to send an abusive email to our support team. "Go and f*#@ yourself, u think I give a f*#@ing s#*! ure all f*#@ing pussies? you allow s#*! pussy f*#@ers post bullshit and then Im the toxic for spitting the true? yeah f*#@ off, i dont give a s#*! what a group of pathetic cowards think. If u say something stupid then eat the s#*! when it comes to you f*#@ing pussies. f*#@ your self."

It's a quirk of the system if you have 2FA enabled - it's on our long list of small bugs to look into. For now you might just want to open the login page in a new tab.

Please see the pinned post for troubleshooting advice and start your own thread. Thanks.

That's not currently a feature of the image share. I think you may be the first person to ever ask for it. We do know that the image share needs some rethinking and will look into it once we migrate it to the new site design. I'm afraid that could be a quite a while away yet though.

Unfortunately this is simply going to be an issue with the routing between your location and the images server (combined with some mod authors uploading ~7MB images). A VPN may improve the performance but otherwise there isn't too much we can do about this.

From what I've been told it's a reference to the explorer :)

We could look at adding something like this, but the big question is where to put it. The forum is currently structured with siloed sections for each game, so you could always post it under the game forum with a tag for Collections?

While I definitely see the value of "copyleft", I just feel anything the forces mod authors to use a particular license just won't work. If they directly use new meshes, textures, scripts, etc I can see that, but if they just reference them via master or forward simple value changes I see no reason to try and force them to open source their work.

There has already been plenty of discussion about how to license the Community Patch project on the Starfield Modding Discord and we believe it seems like a larger conversation that would benefit from a forum thread. The Aim Before we decide on a license, I feel it's important to lay out what we want to achieve. This should better inform the choices. The Community Patch is intended to be a collection of bugfixes to improve the quality of the base game, therefore it should be as open as possible so that parts of it can be reused or overwritten by other mods. The license should: Ensure that contributors are properly credited.Allow for parts of the patch the be included in or edited by other mods. While we'd prefer there to be one "main" Community Patch, this would also allow for derivatives. Direct derivatives (e.g. SCP - Cheaters Edition) should be required to share the same license of the original patch.The patch itself should be able to freely shared around (provided the license is respected), so it can be posted on Nexus Mods, Bethesda.net, Steam Workshop or any other applicable platform without issue. Mods that include parts of SCP or require it as a master should not be force to use the same license. We should ensure mod authors who want to have more control over their work are able to. Prevent the direct monetisation of the patch through methods such as paywalling. Be simple to understand!If I've missed something here, let me know and I'll add it. Current Recommendation Dual License Binary data (e.g. the plugin) will be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. Code (e.g. scripts) will be shared under GPL 3.0, with an adjustment to ensure that mods which use part of the patch or require it as a master can have closed permissions, if the mod author prefers that approach. (Possibly LGPL?) Alternatives This is a list of alternatives that have either been discussed and dismissed or require further investigation.

Bethesda gave us a first look at one of the Starfield companions:

For sure. I am already imagining a Stargate-style portal system.

thenoobmastergg has received a formal warning. This user has now received 1 formal warnings. The warning was given for the following reason: Reference This warning was issued for what took place here Restrictions in place As part of the warning, thenoobmastergg has had the following restrictions placed on his or her account: This user cannot upload files for 14 days Important links: Our terms of service

sleepytigereyes banned Reason: Spamming a member of staff with abusive PMs after your mod page was placed under moderation. From our site rules: "Our staff and moderators have the right to carry out their duties enforcing our Terms of Service without harassment, insult or hassle. If a user attacks a member of the moderation team in any way they will be banned from our service and may forfeit any right to appeal the decision. " Reference post Reference post Moderation history This member received 3 informal warnings and 2 formal warnings before they were banned

Sorry to hear that. You might want to try reporting it as a fault to your ISP, not sure they can/will do anything but it's often caused by them using "cheaper" routes to connect you to our servers.

Thanks for submitting your tests. Based on the reported speeds, I can see that you are getting over 2MB/s which means there are no limits from our side in place. As you get a limited speed from all our servers around the world I'm afraid this is an ISP or routing issue. You might be able to try with a VPN to see if the speeds increase.

It's up to the mod author(s) if they want to allow comments or not. You can post in the relevant game forums if you want to explain the issue to the community more openly.